On Monday 09 May 2005 15:34, Benjamin Teuber wrote:
Können wir mal versuchen, die wenigen tatsächlichen Inhalte des
Textes im Kern zu erfassen, um dann die Relevanz der Argumente zu
überprüfen - oder meint ihr dass der Aufwand sich nichtmal lohnt?
ergänzend zu s.mz und s.mn. noch ein artikel aus 2002 zum
thema:
Sonderberg, Johan. (2002).
"Copyleft vs. Copyright: A Marxist critique."
First Monday, volume 7, number 3 (March 2002)
http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue7_3/soderberg/index.html
http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue7_3/soderberg/
First Monday
Copyleft vs. Copyright: A Marxist critique by Johan Soderberg
Abstract
Copyright was invented by and for early capitalism, and its
importance to
that system has grown ever since. To oppose copyright is to
oppose
capitalism. Thus, Marxism is a natural starting point when
challenging
copyright. Marx's concept of a 'general intellect', suggesting that at
some point a collective learning process will surpass physical
labour as a
productive force, offers a promising backdrop to understand the
accomplishments of the free software community. Furthermore, the
chief
concerns of hacker philosophy, creativity and technological
empowerment,
closely correspond to key Marxist concepts of alienation, the
division of
labour, deskilling, and commodification. At the end of my inquiry, I
will
suggest that the development of free software provides an early
model of
the contradictions inherent to information capitalism, and that free
software development has a wider relevance to all future production
of
information.
________________________________
Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.de/
Organisation: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/
Kontakt: projekt oekonux.de