Message 04168 [Homepage] [Navigation]
Thread: oxdeT04125 Message: 4/14 L2 [In index]
[First in Thread] [Last in Thread] [Date Next] [Date Prev]
[Next in Thread] [Prev in Thread] [Next Thread] [Prev Thread]

Re: [ox] Rundschauartikel



Hallo,

Trotzdem bin ich für aufheben, deswegen poste ich den Artikel mal hier
(verstösst so ein Mailinglisten-Archiv eigentlich gegen das Urheberrecht?),
falls er bei der FR nicht mehr find-/linkbar ist:


Kristian Koehntopp schrieb mal 1995:

Im Wesentlichen gilt das unten gesagte auch fuer Deutschland:

--------------------------------zip-----------------------------------
~Subject: Copyright Myths FAQ: 10 big myths about copyright explained
~Date: Sun, 12 Nov 1995 09:00:10 GMT
~From: brad clari.net (Brad Templeton)
~Newsgroups: news.announce.newusers,news.admin.misc,misc.legal,
 misc.legal.computing,misc.int-property,misc.answers,news.answers

[...]
        4) "My posting was just fair use!"

        See other notes on fair use for a detailed answer, but bear
        the following in mind:

        The "fair use" exemption to copyright law was created to allow
        things such as commentary, parody, news reporting, research and
                       ^^^^^^^^^^

        education about copyrighted works without the permission of the
        author.  Intent, and damage to the commercial value of the
        work are important considerations.  Are you reproducing an
        article from the New York Times because you needed to in order
        to criticise the quality of the New York Times, or because you
        couldn't find time to write your own story, or didn't want your
        readers to have to pay to log onto the online services with the
        story or buy a copy of the paper?  The former is probably fair
        use, the latter probably aren't.

        Fair use is almost always a short excerpt and almost always
        attributed.  (One should not use more of the work than is
        necessary to make the commentary.) It should not harm the
        commercial value of the work (which is another reason why
        reproduction of the entire work is generally forbidden.)

        Note that most inclusion of text in Usenet followups is for
        commentary and reply, and it doesn't damage the commercial
        value of the original posting (if it has any) and as such it
        is fair use.  Fair use isn't an exact doctrine, either.  The
        court decides if the right to comment overrides the copyright
        on an indidvidual basis in each case.  There have been cases
        that go beyond the bounds of what I say above, but in general
        they don't apply to the typical net misclaim of fair use.
        It's a risky defence to attempt.

[...]
--------------------------------zap-----------------------------------

Der komplette Artikel sollte auf jedem FAQ-Server im unter
Archive-Name gezeigten Verzeichnis vorhanden sein. Auf Wunsch
sende ich ihn auch per E-Mail zu.

aus:
   Url: http://www.koehntopp.de/kris/inkomploehntopp/00047.html


-- 
Salut
 _)oachim
________________________________
Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.de/
Organisation: projekt oekonux.de


[English translation]
Thread: oxdeT04125 Message: 4/14 L2 [In index]
Message 04168 [Homepage] [Navigation]