Re: [ox] Rundschauartikel
- From: j.merkel tbx.berlinet.de (Joachim Merkel)
- Date: 09 Dec 2001 01:33:00 GMT
Hallo,
Trotzdem bin ich für aufheben, deswegen poste ich den Artikel mal hier
(verstösst so ein Mailinglisten-Archiv eigentlich gegen das Urheberrecht?),
falls er bei der FR nicht mehr find-/linkbar ist:
Kristian Koehntopp schrieb mal 1995:
Im Wesentlichen gilt das unten gesagte auch fuer Deutschland:
--------------------------------zip-----------------------------------
~Subject: Copyright Myths FAQ: 10 big myths about copyright explained
~Date: Sun, 12 Nov 1995 09:00:10 GMT
~From: brad clari.net (Brad Templeton)
~Newsgroups: news.announce.newusers,news.admin.misc,misc.legal,
misc.legal.computing,misc.int-property,misc.answers,news.answers
[...]
4) "My posting was just fair use!"
See other notes on fair use for a detailed answer, but bear
the following in mind:
The "fair use" exemption to copyright law was created to allow
things such as commentary, parody, news reporting, research and
^^^^^^^^^^
education about copyrighted works without the permission of the
author. Intent, and damage to the commercial value of the
work are important considerations. Are you reproducing an
article from the New York Times because you needed to in order
to criticise the quality of the New York Times, or because you
couldn't find time to write your own story, or didn't want your
readers to have to pay to log onto the online services with the
story or buy a copy of the paper? The former is probably fair
use, the latter probably aren't.
Fair use is almost always a short excerpt and almost always
attributed. (One should not use more of the work than is
necessary to make the commentary.) It should not harm the
commercial value of the work (which is another reason why
reproduction of the entire work is generally forbidden.)
Note that most inclusion of text in Usenet followups is for
commentary and reply, and it doesn't damage the commercial
value of the original posting (if it has any) and as such it
is fair use. Fair use isn't an exact doctrine, either. The
court decides if the right to comment overrides the copyright
on an indidvidual basis in each case. There have been cases
that go beyond the bounds of what I say above, but in general
they don't apply to the typical net misclaim of fair use.
It's a risky defence to attempt.
[...]
--------------------------------zap-----------------------------------
Der komplette Artikel sollte auf jedem FAQ-Server im unter
Archive-Name gezeigten Verzeichnis vorhanden sein. Auf Wunsch
sende ich ihn auch per E-Mail zu.
aus:
Url: http://www.koehntopp.de/kris/inkomploehntopp/00047.html
--
Salut
_)oachim
________________________________
Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.de/
Organisation: projekt oekonux.de