Message 09263 | [Homepage] | [Navigation] | |
---|---|---|---|
Thread: oxdeT09236 Message: 29/32 L1 | [In index] | ||
[First in Thread] | [Last in Thread] | [Date Next] | [Date Prev] |
[Next in Thread] | [Prev in Thread] | [Next Thread] | [Prev Thread] |
[ xpost+fup2 [ox] ] * Hans-Gert Gräbe <graebe informatik.uni-leipzig.de> [2005-03-29 16:03]:
Thomas U. Grüttmüller wrote:If you have something else in mind, please also say how you would do it. You cannot just say, "Let's use license XY instead of the GFDL" because this would make the wiki incompatible with both, Wikipedia and Open Theory. You cannot take GFDLed texts and put them under another license. Only the copyright holder can do that. And if license XY is not GFDL-compatible, the other direction won't work either.Thats a strong argument in favor of GFDL.
Personally, I'd still prefer using some non-copyleft (GFDL-compatible) license (if any) over reusing GFDL material. However, if you want to reuse Wikipedia or Open Theory stuff, there is of course no choice. Copyleft is useless and annoying, and we should probably use it. Holger -- PGP fingerprint: F1F0 9071 8084 A426 DD59 9839 59D3 F3A1 B8B5 D3DE ________________________________ Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.de/ Organisation: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/ Kontakt: projekt oekonux.de
[English translation] | |||
Thread: oxdeT09236 Message: 29/32 L1 | [In index] | ||
---|---|---|---|
Message 09263 | [Homepage] | [Navigation] |